Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Table 5 Determinants of dual contraception acceptance

From: Improving public health service delivery response to address contraceptive needs of socio-economically disadvantaged HIV positive people in Maharashtra, India

Background Variables

Unadjusted Odds Ratio

Adjusted Odds Ratio

Index client

Male

1

1

Female

2** (1.42–2.81)

1.66* (1.12–2.46)

Education Status

Literate

1

1

Illiterate

1.62 (0.96–2.72)

1.44 (0.8–2.59)

CD4 count above 80th Percentile

No

1

1

Yes

1.26 (0.83–1.9)

1.7* (1.07–2.71)

Partner HIV Status

Negative

1

1

Positive

1.97** (1.4–2.77)

1.65* (1.13–2.43)

Decision Making

Self

1

1

Husband/Family/Doctors/Others

1.63* (1.04–2.53)

1.26 (0.77–2.08)

Method preference

Condom Only

1

1

Dual methods

4.92** (3.26–7.44)

4.56** (2.94–7.06)

  1. **p < 0.001, *p < 0.05
  2. Variables like religion, place of residence, type of family, per capita income, ART status, perception of family planning method being harmful, sexual partner other than the spouse, currently sexually active, desiring another child in future, spouse desiring the same number of children, any illness in last one month showed insignificant results
Back to article page

Contraception and Reproductive Medicine

ISSN: 2055-7426

Contact us