Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 3 Bi-variable and multivariable logistic regression of factors associated with unmet need for family planning among currently married women in Hawella Tulla Sub-city, Hawassa, Southern Ethiopia, 2021

From: Unmet need for family planning and associated factors among currently married women in Hawella Tulla subcity, Hawassa, southern Ethiopia: community-based study

Variables

Unmet need for FP

COR (95%CI)

AOR (95%CI)

Yes

No

  

Age of respondent (in years)

<=24

13

38

1

1

25–34

34

180

0.55 (0.27, 1.14)*

0.57 (0.23, 1.42)

> = 35

32

139

0.67 (0.32, 1.41)

0.57 (0.19, 1.66)

Educational status

No formal education

37

128

2.34 (1.18, 4.62)*

2.23 (1.02, 4.84)**

Primary school

29

124

1.89 (0.93, 3.82)*

1.55 (0.67, 3.57)

Secondary and above

13

105

1

1

Husband educational status

No formal education

23

97

1.34 (0.72, 2.52)

0.65 (0.31, 1.35)

Primary School

32

124

1.46 (0.82, 2.62)*

1.25 (0.62, 2.53)

Secondary and Above

24

136

1

1

Media Access

    

Yes

40

261

1

1

No

39

96

2.65 (1.61, 4.37)*

2.13 (1.19, 3.81)**

Residence

Urban

28

99

1

1

Rural

51

258

0.70 (0.42, 1.17)*

0.84 (0.47, 1.50)

Age at first marriage (in years)

<  18

45

128

2.37 (1.44, 3.89)*

1.95 (1.14, 3.33)**

≥ 18

34

229

1

1

Parity

≤1

21

111

0.55 (0.26, 1.16)*

0.41 (0.14, 1.22)

2–4

41

206

0.53 (0.27, 1.05)*

0.57 (0.25, 1.30)

≥ 5

17

40

1

1

Husband support for FP use

Yes

31

216

1

1

No

48

141

2.37 (1.44, 3.91)*

2.32 (1.35, 3.99)**

  1. Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-ft = 0.344
  2. Abbreviations: COR, crude odds ratio; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval
  3. NB. 1: reference, *Remained significant at P-Value < 0.25, **Remained significant at P-Value < 0.05