Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association of premarital pregnancy with adverse birth outcomes and its characteristics in Japan

Contraception and Reproductive Medicine volume 10, Article number: 30 (2025) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

A study investigating the association between premarital pregnancy and the adverse birth outcomes has not been conducted in Japan. This study aimed to investigate an association of premarital pregnancy with adverse birth outcomes and its characteristics in Japan, using national birth data.

Methods

Birth data from the Vital Statistics: Occupational and Industrial Aspects for the fiscal years 2010, 2015, and 2020 were used. Firstborn and singleton births were used, and we restricted the data to infants born to Japanese parents. We defined the status of premarital pregnancy based on the length of marriage at the time of birth. Rates of preterm birth, term low birth weight (TLBW), and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) were used as outcomes. Log-binomial regression analysis was conducted to calculate the adjusted risk ratio of premarital pregnancy for each of the outcomes. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with premarital pregnancy.

Results

Data from 888,459 births were included in the analysis. The results of log-binomial regression showed that the risk of premarital pregnancy was statistically significantly higher than that of postmarital pregnancy for all the outcomes, and the risk ratios were 1.65 (95% confidence intervals (CI):1.58, 1.72), 1.17 (95% CI:1.12, 1.22), and 1.12 (95% CI:1.08, 1.17) for preterm birth, TLBW, and SGA, respectively. The results of logistic regression analysis showed that lower non-manual workers, manual workers, and others were significantly and positively associated with premarital pregnancy compared to upper non-manual workers in terms of maternal and paternal occupations.

Conclusions

It was shown that premarital pregnancy was associated with a higher risk of preterm birth, TLBW, and SGA and was positively associated with parental occupations such as lower non-manual workers and manual workers in Japan.

Background

Although childbearing is not always accompanied by marriage in many countries, the percentage of infants born to unmarried mothers is low in Japan, approximately 2% in recent years [1]. In contrast, premarital (bridal) pregnancy, where pregnancy occurs before marriage, is prevalent in Japan, and the proportion was approximately 20% among first-born births within marriage in recent years [2]. The proportion of premarital pregnancies increased from around 1980 until the early 2000s in Japan, but it has been showing a subtle decreasing trend since then [2].

Premarital pregnancy is known to be associated with adverse birth outcomes in some countries, and an association with preterm birth and low birthweight was observed [3, 4]. Preterm birth, low birthweight, and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) are major adverse birth outcomes and are risk factors for infant mortality [5, 6]. Moreover, they are risk factors for the occurrence of chronic diseases in adults [7, 8]. While studies investigating the association of premarital pregnancy with a mother’s workstyle and subsequent childbearing have been conducted in Japan [9, 10], a study investigating the association between premarital pregnancy and the adverse birth outcomes has not been conducted. In Japan, it is known that sociodemographic factors can affect adverse birth outcomes, and there is a possibility that premarital pregnancy is associated with adverse birth outcomes if premarital pregnancy is caused by sociodemographic reasons.

In Japan, it is known that the proportion of premarital pregnancy is high among teenagers and is positively associated with lower educational levels in Japan [2, 9], although the number of participants in the survey was relatively limited. Furthermore, studies investigating the characteristics of premarital pregnancy are scarce in Japan, and there have been no studies investigating the association between premarital pregnancy and sociodemographic characteristics of parents using national birth data (the Vital Statistics) in Japan.

In this study, we investigated the association between premarital pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes and the characteristics of premarital pregnancy in Japan using national birth data.

Methods

Data and data processing

In this study, we used birth data from the Vital Statistics: Occupational and Industrial Aspects for the fiscal years 2010, 2015, and 2020 in Japan. The data were provided by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare on the basis of Article 33 of the Statistics Act. The Vital Statistics survey investigating occupations of parents is conducted every five fiscal years. In addition, the Vital Statistics survey is conducted based on birth certificates. Parents write basic information of infants and themselves in the birth certificates, and medical characteristics of infants are written by a medical professional. Specifically, we used data that included information on marital status, age, nationality, parity, and the occupation for each mother, as well as the sex, birth year, birth month, birth weight, gestational age (in weeks and days), and the number of fetuses for each infant. Furthermore, we used data on paternal occupation, household occupation, paternal nationality, and the starting year and month of cohabitation. The starting year and month of cohabitation represent the time of either the wedding or the beginning of cohabitation, whichever occurred first. Household occupation means the occupation (employment status) of the top earner of the household. Household occupation was classified into six types: households of farmers, self-employed workers, full-time workers at a smaller company, full-time workers at a larger company, others, and unemployed. “Full-time worker at a smaller company” referred to households where a full-time worker was employed in a company with fewer than 100 employees, while “full-time worker at a larger company” indicates households with a board member of a company or a full-time worker who does not fall under the “full-time worker at a smaller company” category.

Maternal age was grouped into 19 years or less, 20–24 years, 25–29 years, 30–34 years, 35–39 years, and ≥ 40 years. Parental occupations consist of 13 types, and we grouped them into occupational classes for ease of interpretation, as was conducted in previous studies [11,12,13]. They were classified into upper non-manual workers (administrative and managerial workers and professional and engineering workers), lower non-manual workers (clerical workers, sales workers, and service workers), manual workers (manufacturing process workers, transport and machine operating workers, construction and mining workers, and carrying, cleaning, packaging, and related workers), and others (unemployed persons, security workers, agriculture, forestry, and fishery workers, and workers in unclassifiable occupations).

We defined adverse birth outcomes as the occurrence of infants with preterm birth, term low birth weight (TLBW), or SGA. Preterm birth was defined as infants with a gestational age of less than 37 weeks, while the TLBW rate was defined as infants with a birth weight of less than 2500 g among infants with a gestational age of ≥ 37 weeks. SGA was defined based on the neonatal anthropometric chart in Japan. Infants with a birthweight below the 10th percentile on the chart, considering each combination of sex, parity, and gestational age (in weeks and days), were classified as SGA [14]. As the anthropometric chart covers only gestational weeks ranging from 22 to 41, we limited our analysis of SGA to birth data within this gestational period.

Premarital pregnancy was defined based on the length of marriage, which was calculated by subtracting the starting year and month of cohabitation from the birth year and month [2]. For instance, if the starting year and month of cohabitation were in April 2020 and the infant’s birthdate was in November 2020, the length of marriage would be 7 months (11 − 4 = 7). The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in Japan proposed a method for defining premarital pregnancy by combining the length of marriage and gestational age [2], and premarital pregnancy is defined as a birth in which the length of marriage is shorter than the gestational age. Similarly, postmarital pregnancy can be defined as a birth in which the length of marriage is longer than the gestational age. However, because the length of marriage is defined in months (not days) in the data, many births are not classified as premarital or postmarital pregnancies and are not included in the analysis. As a result, births with longer gestational ages tend to be classified as premarital pregnancies among infants born with the same length of marriage, causing selection bias and making it challenging to investigate the association between premarital pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes. It is necessary to consider the definition in which the status of premarital and postmarital pregnancy of each birth is not influenced by the gestational age. Therefore, we defined premarital pregnancy as births with a length of marriage shorter than any gestational age in the data, while postmarital pregnancy was defined as births with a length of marriage longer than any gestational age in the data. The gestation weeks ranged from 17 to 50 weeks in the data. Hence, we defined premarital pregnancy as birth data with lengths of marriage shorter than 3 months and postmarital pregnancy as birth data with lengths of marriage longer than 12 months. A similar method for defining premarital pregnancy was used in a previous study [3].

Statistical analysis

We narrowed the study population to first births of mothers and infants born within a marriage. Additionally, only singleton births were included in the analysis. Moreover, the relationship between marriage and childbirth varies depending on countries, and there are countries where childbirth does not accompany marriage. Therefore, we restricted the data to infants born to Japanese parents.

We tabulated the number of births by various birth characteristics based on the status of premarital pregnancy. Numbers and rates of preterm birth, TLBW, and SGA were also compared between premarital and postmarital pregnancy. Additionally, a log-binomial regression model was used to calculate risk ratio (RR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and p-value for premarital pregnancy in relation to each birth outcome. In this analysis, maternal age group, household occupation, maternal occupation, paternal occupation, and the year of birth were used as explanatory variables. Moreover, logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with premarital pregnancy, and odds ratio (OR), 95% CI, and p-value were calculated for each variable. The outcome variable in the logistic regression analysis was the status of premarital pregnancy, while the explanatory variables included maternal age group, household occupation, maternal occupation, paternal occupation, and the year of birth.

Complete-case analysis was conducted, and multiple imputation was used as a sensitivity analysis to address missing data in the regression analyses. For these analyses, two-sided tests were conducted, and a p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant for the regression analyses. All analyses were conducted using R4.1.3 [15], with the utilization of packages such as lmtest [16] and mice [17]. The statistics shown in this study were created by the authors using data provided by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, and they are not statistics publicly released by the Ministry.

Results

Flowchart of study population

Figure 1 shows flowchart of selection process for the births used in the analysis. The data for analysis comprised 888,459 births.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of selecting birth data which were used in the analysis

Full size image

Birth characteristics by the status of premarital pregnancy

Table 1 presents the number (%) of births categorized by various birth characteristics and the status of premarital pregnancy. Notably, the proportions of mothers aged ≤ 19 years and those aged 20–24 years among premarital pregnancies were 11.0% and 33.1%, respectively, while those among postmarital pregnancies were 0.2% and 4.8%, respectively. Similarly, the proportion of households with a full-time worker at a larger company among premarital pregnancies and postmarital pregnancies were 32.5% and 52.3%, respectively, and the proportions of the other households were higher among premarital pregnancies than among postmarital pregnancies. In addition, the proportions of upper non-manual workers among mothers and fathers for premarital pregnancies were 11.3% and 18.7%, respectively, while those for postmarital pregnancies were 19.3% and 32.8%, respectively.

Table 1 Number (%) of births by birth characteristics and the status of premarital pregnancy
Full size table

Association between premarital pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes

Table 2 provides the numbers and rates of adverse birth outcomes categorized by the status of premarital pregnancy. The rates of preterm birth, TLBW, and SGA for infants born to mothers with premarital pregnancy were 6.8%, 6.9%, and 8.1%, respectively, while those for infants born to mothers with postmarital pregnancy were 4.5%, 6.1%, and 7.4%, respectively. Therefore, the rates of preterm birth, TLBW, and SGA for infants born to mothers with premarital pregnancy were higher than those for infants born to mothers with postmarital pregnancy.

Table 2 Number and rate of the adverse birth outcomes by the status of premarital pregnancy
Full size table

Table 3 presents the results of log-binomial regression analysis for each of the adverse birth outcomes. The RRs of premarital pregnancy were statistically significantly higher than post-marital pregnancy for all the outcomes, and RRs were 1.65 (95% CI:1.58, 1.72), 1.17 (95%CI:1.12, 1.22), and 1.12 (95%CI:1.08, 1.17) for preterm birth, TLBW, and SGA, respectively.

Table 3 The result of log-binomial regression analysis for each of the adverse birth outcomes
Full size table

Supplementary Table 1 shows the results of log-binomial regression analysis using multiple imputation. The findings align with those from the complete-case analysis.

Factors associated with premarital pregnancy

Table 4 displays the results of logistic regression analysis conducted to identify factors associated with premarital pregnancy. The maternal age group of 19 years or less showed a notably positive association with premarital pregnancy, and the OR was 117.36 (95%CI:109.38, 125.92). Regarding household occupation, the households other than the full-time worker at a larger company showed a significant and positive association with premarital pregnancy compared with the full-time worker at a larger company, and the odds ratio was the largest in unemployed household, with an OR of 3.97 (95%CI:3.64, 4.33). Regarding maternal and paternal occupations, individuals in the occupational classes other than upper non-manual workers were positively associated with premarital pregnancy compared to upper non-manual workers. Specifically, the ORs of lower non-manual workers, manual workers, and others were 1.11 (95%CI:1.07, 1.16), 1.09 (95%CI:1.01, 1.19), and 1.18 (95%CI:1.13, 1.22) for maternal occupation, respectively, and those for paternal occupation were 1.37 (95%CI:1.33, 1.41), 1.50 (95%CI:1.45, 1.55), and 1.45 (95%CI:1.39, 1.52), respectively.

Table 4 The result of logistic regression analysis of associated factors of premarital pregnancy
Full size table

Supplementary Table 2 presents the results of logistic regression analysis using multiple imputation. The findings align with those obtained from the complete-case analysis.

Discussion

This study investigated an association of premarital pregnancy with adverse birth outcomes and its sociodemographic characteristics in Japan. As a result, premarital pregnancy was found to be associated with adverse birth outcomes, and some sociodemographic factors were found to be associated with premarital pregnancy. Here, we discuss possible reasons for this association, the implications of our findings, and limitations in this section.

Our findings indicated that premarital pregnancy carries a higher risk of adverse birth outcomes compared to postmarital pregnancy. To our knowledge, there is a paucity of studies that investigated associations between premarital pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes, and a study conducted in Korea also showed the associations of marriage preceded by pregnancy with preterm birth and low birth weight [3]. Unintended pregnancy and prenatal stress were pointed out as possible reasons for the association in the study [3]. A study conducted in Gibraltar also demonstrated that premarital conception is a risk factor for lower birth weight among teenage mothers [4]. As possible reasons for the association between premarital pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes in our study, sociodemographic characteristics of parents who experience premarital pregnancy and the existence of unmarried periods during pregnancy can be pointed out. Regarding sociodemographic characteristics of premarital pregnancy, premarital pregnancy is associated with lower socioeconomic status. In Japan, parental educational level and income level are known to impact adverse birth outcomes [18, 19]. Risk factors for preterm birth and low birth weight such as smoking and lower utilization of prenatal care are positively associated with lower socioeconomic status [20, 21]. Regarding the existence of unmarried periods for premarital pregnancy, unmarried status of mothers is known as a risk factor for adverse birth outcomes in Japan and other countries [22,23,24]. For instance, in Norway, single mothers exhibited lower dietary quality during pregnancy compared to married women [25]. It is also suggested that married individuals tend to take on more responsibility in terms of health-related activities, potentially influencing the health behaviors of pregnant women [24]. Therefore, there is a possibility that socioeconomic status and the existence of unmarried periods during pregnancy are reasons for the associations between premarital pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes.

Regarding factors associated with premarital pregnancy, the maternal age group of “19 years or less” showed a strong association with premarital pregnancy, which is consistent with previous findings [2]. The results suggest that a major factor of marriage for teenage women is pregnancy. In addition, parental and household occupations with lower socioeconomic status had a positive association with premarital pregnancy in this study, highlighting the persistence of socioeconomic disparities in recent years. One possible explanation is that premarital pregnancy is often associated with unplanned pregnancies, as evidenced by previous studies in Japan [26]. Lower socioeconomic status has been associated with unplanned pregnancies in Japan and other countries as well [27,28,29]. Additionally, contraceptive choices can be influenced by socioeconomic status [30, 31], and women with higher educational levels had a negative association with the use of unreliable or no contraception compared with those with lower educational level in Japan [32]. The year of birth was also significantly associated with premarital pregnancy; however, the reason for this finding is uncertain. The effects of factors such as contraception behaviors and the frequency of unplanned pregnancy are considered to differ depending on the year, and the effects of the year of birth might represent those of factors that were not taken into account in this analysis.

As an implication of this study, we have established that premarital pregnancy is a predictor for adverse birth outcomes in Japan. Consequently, it may be necessary to provide more support for women with premarital pregnancies. This support could include recommendation of use of antenatal care or advice on diet and lifestyle behaviors during antenatal care. In addition, an education for contraceptive use is also important to prevent unplanned pregnancy, particularly for men and women with lower socioeconomic status. Furthermore, it is important to investigate the association between premarital pregnancy and health status and behaviors in the future to gain a deeper understanding of the reasons behind the higher risk.

The strength of this study is that we used the Vital Statistics data, and the data cover all births in Japan. In contrast, there are some limitations in this study. First, we defined the length of marriage at the time of birth from the starting time of cohabitation, which represents the time of either the wedding or the beginning of cohabitation, whichever occurred first. Although the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in Japan also uses this starting time of cohabitation to calculate length of marriage, it is considered that there are couples for whom the calculated length of marriage does not precisely correspond to the accurate length of marriage. Additionally, we defined premarital pregnancy as birth data with lengths of marriage shorter than 3 months for the methodological reason, while those birth data are a part of premarital pregnancy. Moreover, other unmeasured factors, such as maternal pregnancy conditions, comorbidities, the educational level, and smoking status were not available in the dataset. A study investigating these aspects would provide valuable insights into the reasons behind the results in this study. Furthermore, because this study targeted infant born to Japanese parents, the results may be generalizable only to Japan. It is meaningful to investigate the association also in other countries.

Conclusions

This study examined the characteristics of premarital pregnancy and its association with adverse birth outcomes among infants born to Japanese parents in Japan. It was shown that the risks for preterm births, TLBW, and SGA were higher in premarital pregnancies than in postmarital pregnancies. In addition, premarital pregnancy was positively associated with parental occupations such as lower non-manual workers and manual workers.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in Japan but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study and are not publicly available. Data are however available from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare if the Ministry permits use of the data.

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence intervals

OR:

Odds ratio

RR:

Risk ratio

SGA:

Small-for-gestational-age

TLBW:

Term low birthweight

References

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. The Vital statistics. https://www.e-stat.go.jp/stat-search/files?page=1&toukei=00450011&tstat=000001028897. Cited on 3 September 2024. Japanese.

  2. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Overview of birth statistics - specified report of vital statistics -. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/list/148-17.html. Cited on 3 September 2024. Japanese.

  3. Lee JY, Park JS, Jun JK, Shin SH, Ko YJ, Park SM. The associations between bridal pregnancy and obstetric outcomes among live births in Korea: population-based study. PLoS One. 2014;9(8): e103178.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sawchuk LA, Burke SD, Benady S. Assessing the impact of adolescent pregnancy and the premarital conception stress complex on birth weight among young mothers in Gibraltar’s civilian community. J Adolesc Health. 1997;21(4):259–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Callaghan WM, MacDorman MF, Rasmussen SA, Qin C, Lackritz EM. The contribution of preterm birth to infant mortality rates in the United States. Pediatrics. 2006;118(4):1566–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lau C, Ambalavanan N, Chakraborty H, Wingate MS, Carlo WA. Extremely low birth weight and infant mortality rates in the United States. Pediatrics. 2013;131(5):855–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Heikkilä K, Pulakka A, Metsälä J, Alenius S, Hovi P, Gissler M, Sandin S, Kajantie E. Preterm birth and the risk of chronic disease multimorbidity in adolescence and early adulthood: A population-based cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(12): e0261952.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Jancevska A, Tasic V, Damcevski N, Danilovski D, Jovanovska V, Gucev Z. Children born small for gestational age (SGA). Prilozi. 2012;33(2):47–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Iwasawa M, Kamata K. Marriage preceded by pregnancy and women’s employment. Japan Labor Review. 2014;11(4):21–51.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Uchikoshi F, Mogi R. Order matters: The effect of premarital pregnancy on second childbearing in Japan. Demogr Res. 2018;39:1305–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tomioka K, Kurumatani N, Saeki K. The association between education and smoking prevalence, independent of occupation: a nationally representative survey in Japan. J Epidemiol. 2020;30(3):136–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Zaitsu M, Kobayashi Y, Myagmar-Ochir E, Takeuchi T, Kobashi G, Kawachi I. Occupational disparities in survival from common cancers in Japan: Analysis of Kanagawa cancer registry. Cancer Epidemiol. 2022;77: 102115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tanaka H, Nusselder WJ, Bopp M, Brønnum-Hansen H, Kalediene R, Lee JS, Leinsalu M, Martikainen P, Menvielle G, Kobayashi Y, Mackenbach JP. Mortality inequalities by occupational class among men in Japan, South Korea and eight European countries: a national register-based study, 1990–2015. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019;73(8):750–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. The committee for neonates of the Japan Pediatric Society. About revision of the new neonatal anthropometric chart by gestational age. J Jpn Pediatr Soc. 2010;114(11):1771–806 Japanese.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/. Cited on 3 September 2024.

  16. Zeileis A, Hothorn T. Diagnostic checking in regression relationships. R News. 2002;2(3):7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  17. van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw. 2011;45(3):1–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hayashi I, Takakura K, Yamaguchi K, Sumitomo M, Suzuki M, Sumitomo A, Minato S, Nose Y, Nagai N, Sakane N. Association between socioeconomic status and small-for-gestational-age in Japan: A single center retrospective cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020;46(1):110–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fujiwara T, Ito J, Kawachi I. Income inequality, parental socioeconomic status, and birth outcomes in Japan. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;177(10):1042–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sui Y, Ahuru RR, Huang K, Anser MK, Osabohien R. Household socioeconomic status and antenatal care utilization among women in the reproductive-age. Front Public Health. 2021;9: 724337.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Tabuchi T, Kondo N. Educational inequalities in smoking among Japanese adults aged 25–94 years: Nationally representative sex- and age-specific statistics. J Epidemiol. 2017;27(4):186–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Shapiro GD, Bushnik T, Wilkins R, Kramer MS, Kaufman JS, Sheppard AJ, Yang S. Adverse birth outcomes in relation to maternal marital and cohabitation status in Canada. Ann Epidemiol. 2018;28(8):503-509.e11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Okui T. Difference in risk of preterm and small-for-gestational-age birth depending on maternal occupations in Japan. BMC Res Notes. 2023;16(1):259.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Barr JJ, Marugg L. Impact of marriage on birth outcomes: pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system, 2012–2014. Linacre Q. 2019;86(2–3):225–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Farbu J, Haugen M, Meltzer HM, Brantsæter AL. Impact of singlehood during pregnancy on dietary intake and birth outcomes- a study in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:396.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Moriyama S, Shimada M. Effects of pregnancy-preceding marriage on mother’s feelings toward her child, maternal consciousness and behavior, and marital relationships in child bearing periods. J Child Health. 2011;70(2):280–90 Japanese.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Okui T. Association of socioeconomic status with unintended pregnancy and induced abortion in married couples: An analysis of the 2021 national survey data in Japan. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2024;30: 101814.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Omani-Samani R, Amini Rarani M, Sepidarkish M, Khedmati Morasae E, Maroufizadeh S, Almasi-Hashiani A. Socioeconomic inequality of unintended pregnancy in the Iranian population: a decomposition approach. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):607.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Iseyemi A, Zhao Q, McNicholas C, Peipert JF. Socioeconomic status as a risk factor for unintended pregnancy in the contraceptive CHOICE Project. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(3):609–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Metcalfe A, Talavlikar R, du Prey B, Tough SC. Exploring the relationship between socioeconomic factors, method of contraception and unintended pregnancy. Reprod Health. 2016;13:28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang Y, Chen M, Tan S, Qu X, Wang H, Liang X, Gaoshan J, Li L, Hong P, Jiang L, Tang K. The socioeconomic and lifestyle determinants of contraceptive use among Chinese college students: a cross-sectional study. Reprod Health. 2020;17(1):125.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Konishi S, Tamaki E. Pregnancy intention and contraceptive use among married and unmarried women in Japan. Jpn J Health & Human Ecology. 2016;82(3):110–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP22K17372.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Information Center, Kyushu University Hospital, Maidashi3-1-1 Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka City, Fukuoka prefecture, 812-8582, Japan

    Tasuku Okui & Naoki Nakashima

Authors
  1. Tasuku Okui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Naoki Nakashima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: TO. Data curation: TO. Formal analysis: TO. Methodology: TO. Funding acquisition: TO. Writing- original draft: TO. Writing - review & editing: TO, NN.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tasuku Okui.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Kyushu University Institutional Review Board for Clinical Research (No. 22221–07). In addition, informed consent was not required for this study because we used the official statistics data that were provided from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare on the basis of the Statistics Act in Japan.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okui, T., Nakashima, N. Association of premarital pregnancy with adverse birth outcomes and its characteristics in Japan. Contracept Reprod Med 10, 30 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40834-025-00357-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40834-025-00357-4

Keywords

Contraception and Reproductive Medicine

ISSN: 2055-7426

Contact us